In the last post we looked at the number of deals by geography for the first quarter of 2011. Another interesting thing to look at is how much investment by geography took place. No doubt that we can expect a high correlation between the number of deals and the total investment in a geography, so the charts we would expect to look similar. One factor to consider though is that we already found that the average investment for a venture deal is on the order of $7M, with the median somewhere around $3M. So that says that there are some significant outliers and deals that cause significant leverage on the venture deal statistics.
Below you can see the chart that shows the total venture investment by geography for the first quarter 2012.

As we thought, the information from the chart bundles quite a few states together in the 0-$1B range, with several states showing no recorded deals in the dataset. California looks like a magnet for venture capital money, which is not surprising given that the numbers for Silicon Valley, Los Angeles, and San Diego are all combined and compared to the rest of the country. Notably Massachusetts shows up somewhere in between the other states and California as it should, since the Boston area is somewhere around the #2 or #3 area for attracting venture investment, depending on the year how the regions are carved out and counted.